|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
IrinaDDD
Joined: 24 Jan 2012 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you, Mat.
You helped me a lot.
Best regards,
Irina |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IrinaDDD
Joined: 24 Jan 2012 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, Mat,
The results I showed you before with small data copies before each kernel was obtained, by using 12.5 version of the PGI compiler.
Now, when I use 12.10 version there are much less copies then it was for 12.5 one, but, for some reason, execution time for one of the kernels became about 3 times longer.
I specify grid and block size by myself, so, this parameters are fixed.
Execution time for other kernels doesn’t change and I wonder why only one of the kernels shows different results?
Thank you in advance,
Irina. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mkcolg
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 4996 Location: The Portland Group Inc.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Irina,
We introduced OpenACC in 12.6 and with it some major changes.
I would consider your issue a performance bug, especially if you were able to work around it by explicitly setting the schedule. Scheduling is very difficult so when the compiler's automatic scheduler is getting it wrong, we'd like to know about it. Can you send a report to PGI Customer Service (trs@pgroup.com) and include a reproducing example?
Thanks,
Mat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|