| Author |
Message |
 Topic: function inlining |
mkcolg
Replies: 2
Views: 43
|
 Forum: Accelerator Programming Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:21 pm Subject: function inlining |
Hi Mihn,
In looking at the full file you'll see that several of the variables used in this routine are module data having the SAVE attribute. However, this limit may be too restrictive so I've put ... |
| Topic: Internal compiler error |
mkcolg
Replies: 7
Views: 86
|
Forum: Programming and Compiling Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:19 am Subject: Internal compiler error |
Is that right, that the namelist in module case is fixed in 13.7?Assuming that it passes QA, then yes, the fix will be available in next month's 13.7 release.
- Mat |
| Topic: Internal compiler error |
mkcolg
Replies: 7
Views: 86
|
Forum: Programming and Compiling Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:31 am Subject: Internal compiler error |
Ok, it appears that this restriction was from F95, but was loosened in F2003. Not sure why the Metcalf book still lists is as illegal.
Engineering has already fixed the problem and should be avail ... |
| Topic: Internal compiler error |
mkcolg
Replies: 7
Views: 86
|
Forum: Programming and Compiling Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:12 am Subject: Internal compiler error |
| Is that was because at the time of calling namelist containing subroutine array was allocated already?I'm not sure, but possible. More likely, we accepted the syntax when we shouldn't have and that i ... |
| Topic: FORTRAN 2003 abstract=>concrete class issue |
mkcolg
Replies: 1
Views: 116
|
Forum: Programming and Compiling Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 9:05 am Subject: FORTRAN 2003 abstract=>concrete class issue |
Hi Bryce,
Apologies for the late reply. I passed this on to engineering who agree it's PGI compiler error. We have added a problem report (TPR#19398) and hope to have this fixed in the near futur ... |
| |
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in